Maybe I'm not a council member, but I was twice, so I got some experience.
Zedwick's voting system.The system suggested is good. But, if we go as yes = passed, no = another discussion, there is no place for no as what it means. We need something that will end voting with no because the majority is against THE topic no matter what. Maybe add more voting after 'no' occur.
If we are going to consider 'no' = vote again, then would be voted why no. No, because needs better wording, more discussion, or no because against the topic.
NominationNothing to add, just a question. Which method will be used for this meeting?
The Chair of the councilJohn Bercow, LVS edition or what? If yes, and if I get into the council, I'm for it to take the role!